Journal, Philosophy, Politics, Religion, Sociology

Why Evil People Live in Good Societies

Good and evil are often construed as relative terms. One of the most common lies in the upper levels of academia today is that truth is relative. One look at the head banner on my website will tell you that I believe otherwise. Indeed, truth cannot be relative, or it ceases to be truth.

The idea of good and evil is tied to the idea of truth. But what is an evil person? Isn’t it casting stones to label some people as evil? Yes it is, but that is not my point. Everyone is evil. Every single person, from the most deranged and evil criminals in prison to mother Theresa herself, is evil.

Every single person, from the most deranged and evil criminals in prison to mother Theresa herself, is evil.

People are evil because they are capable of evil. No person will ever manage to be completely good for their entire life. You can probably think of someone who sees you as a villain or even the villain in their story.

If every person is evil, then, how do we know that some people are good? For example, I doubt very many people could call their mother evil. Most people would suggest that mother Theresa is a saint for a good reason. There are so many examples of ‘good’ people that the idea of evil man is uncomfortable.

The solution to this contradiction is that all humankind is evil, but humans can be trained to act in goodness. Evil people must learn to be good.

Society is no different. Society depends on the people who live in it. A society that depends solely on the people within it will become evil before long. The Athenian democracy is an example of a people who voted themselves into oblivion. James Madison warned against the fallibility of man in The Federalist Papers. “In all very numerous assemblies, of whatever characters composed, passion never fails to wrest the sceptre from reason. Had every Athenian citizen been a Socrates, every Athenian assembly would still have been a mob.”

In The Federalist No. 10 Madison warns against mobs who are “united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.”

There is no such thing as a good person, only evil people who are taught to be good. There can be good societies, however. Good societies are devoted to the same principles that help evil people. A good society entrenches those principles, so that evil men are forced to abide by them.

Laws exist as a mold to form good citizens. A citizen who actively steals and kills is not a model citizen. Laws do not exist to inconvenience citizens, but to shape them into better people. The immutability of the societies’ values protect it against being corrupted by evil people. This is why any dying society will show the signs of moral decay and departure from tradition.

The immutability of the societies’ values protect it against being corrupted by evil people.

Rome was overrun by degeneracy before it collapsed, such that when it was finally sacked in the 5th century, it had already been dead for a long time.

The United States is based on Judeo-Christian values. These are the basis for law and the constitution. These ideas form the mold that make evil people better.

Evil people are inescapable. People who choose to be good are in constant danger of disappearing. Only widespread dedication to those values which better man are sufficient to preserve a society. The United States would do well to remember that.

11 thoughts on “Why Evil People Live in Good Societies

  1. Pretty decent post. I just stumbled upon your site and wanted to say that I have in reality enjoyed reading your web site posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon.

    1. Thank you for your comment! I’m happy to see that people are still reading my posts. I have several new posts coming up, thank you for subscribing!

  2. Hiya, I loved reading your post. Thank you for the huge info. Hoped that we will lengthen our friendship through a mutual hyperlink trade? Let me know, and fine to see you here!

  3. This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job, indeed.

  4. Thank you for the link. Good points. I would only add that societies do oscillate, between periods of vigour and periods of decay. In the 18th century corruption was widespread and jobs were seen as sinecures. The stuffed Dodo preserved at Oxford was allowed to rot by its negligent curators, for instance. But it was succeeded by the Victorian era. Our own age may be followed by better. Nil desperandum.

    1. Thank you for your comment! I wholeheartedly agree with you on the oscillation. One of my favorite authors at the moment is Oswald Spengler, who posits a theory of oscillation between grand societies, which begin to decay after they have ceased to generate culture and fall into decadence. His reasonings are more of a poetry than a hard science, and he can sometimes read like prose, but I am finding that his theories are highly accurate when compared with the status quo of Western Civilization. More importantly than naturalistic oscillation, I believe that the Church will persevere, and therefore goodness and virtue will persevere also. Thank you for your positivity!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.